As we have discussed before, the Christian Methusaleh died in the flood in 1776CE, where 1CE represents the birth of Jesus, or Man is 120 years before Adam. Thus, 120 plus the year of the birth of Adam to the flood yields 1776, which is the end of antediluvian Christianity. Jesus was the Christian Man, but he was not the first Man. The first Man was in the first creation story of Genesis, in Genesis chapter 1. Adam followed, but he was not a man in some senses, and his years were not 120. The second Man I don’t know, but the third was probably Ham. Every thousand years a Man comes. Ham is the African Messiah. The date of his birth is not recorded in Torah, but it is probably 2,000. Where traditionally Noah lived from 1056 to 2006, but that is actually incorrect, and the correct dates are 1176 to 2126 by adding 120 for the first Man. Moses is the 4th man and the Messiah of the Jews. I suggest he lived in 3,000, which is a possible date according to the Septuigint, and again the number 120 is associated with his name. David in 4,000. His kingdom is generally thought to be 1,000BCE. Jesus in 5,000. He was a new Man, not the New Adam, so there is some confusion there. Odin/Woden in 6,000, or 1,000CE. He is the Norse Messiah. Now the new Man is in 7,000 or 2,000CE in the Gregorian calendar.
When Jesus makes his claim I AM, what he is really saying is I OM, where I AM or man spoke to Moses in the burning bush. Moses is the new I am or Man. Really, Man is not a name for God though. I haven’t suggested God yet in this blog entry. This blog entry is not about God or theology, but about the numbers associated with some very important men in history. Thus, I do believe Jesus was a son of God, but that did not make him God. God is not a locality. Do not worship a locality. That is idol worship!!! Idol worship is very bad. It is forbidden. The claim that he, Jesus, is I am is a statement that he is a Man or Messsiah, but not a God. He is not David ha-Moshiach, meaning he is not the last Messiah. He didn’t claim that.
I argue that “Before Abraham was,” in John 8:58 is a mistranslation. The correct version of the Greek is a prediction that following the Kingship of Jesus another Abraham will arise in 2068CE. The alternative translation is the correct one. Some argue that γενέσθαι here should be read as future tense — “before Abraham comes to be,” where this future Abraham is not yet born in Christianity and will bring monotheism to Christianity. I suggest we work to help this.
No comments:
Post a Comment